Debunking American Shark Fisheries


Human stupidity is reaching new heights in the arguments put forth by American shark fisheries advocates in an effort to block The Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act of 2019. There are always scientists who are willing to speak up for industry and they, along with a variety of fisheries coalitions are doing their best to keep it from becoming law. But their arguments amount to protesting that the ivory trade is good for elephants in the United States, or the trade in rhino horn is good for rhinos, in the United States. 

This video debunks the main points raised by fisheries advocates.

When shark fins bring in a fortune comparable to the drug trade, it is natural that these fishermen are going to fight and make up all sorts of stories to continue to get that money--it means so much to them. But The Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act has determined that the amount of money that fishermen are losing is not enough to continue to perpetuate the monstrous shark fin trade worldwide. 

In every country that became a sanctuary for sharks, or in which the shark fin trade was banned, fishermen had to give up the money they were getting for the fins. However, they did not try to turn their complaints into a scientific paper, or pretend that they were not implicated in a global catastrophe. It is too easy to make money by killing things that are rare, and those who are willing to do it should be denounced.

It is easy to say that a fishery is sustainable with no evidence, but if it is, why are more than ninety percent of sharks already lost? Why are some of these so-called "sustainable" fisheries throwing away endangered species as by-catch? Don't believe fishermen's stories. They are used to making up big ones. Compare the size of fish caught in the 1950s with those caught now:

Fishermen posing with their catch in a tournament in the 1950s
Fish caught in a recent tournament.
These photos of the fish caught in tournaments in the 1950's, above, and in a recent tournament, below, gives an idea of what is happening with American fisheries.

Now, with fish stocks in serious trouble, fishermen are turning to sharks to replace such fish as the cod, now that they are gone. 

But look at it logically. How can you replace food fish with top predators? That is like replacing cows with wolves, or sheep with cats. It is simply a crazy idea, and if it isn't stopped, will lead to the crashing of the ecological balance of the ocean.  

No animals can withstand targeted, industrial hunting. Period.

So please support The Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act of 2019. It is badly needed to help stall the global catastrophe that has been caused by the shark fin trade.

(c) Ila France Porcher
     Author of The True Nature of Sharks and The Shark Sessions


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Letter to the Discovery Network

Image
To the Discovery Network: Members of our Internet shark discussion forum, SHARK-L, have been asked by your marketing representatives to help promote your famous Shark Week sequence. This letter, signed by list members and friends, is our formal response to the request from your grass roots agency, New Media Strategies, for our support of the programming. How can we support Discovery Channel when we are fighting for shark conservation, and its biggest obstacle is the monster image given to sharks by the media, including Shark Week programs? Further, some of us who have been directly involved in the production of your documentaries feel disgusted at the way that our interviews were censored and our words twisted around. Our group is comprised of scientists, researchers, educators, media companies, and many NGO's, lobbyists and others. In aggregate we represent a strong network of influence that can help or hurt the efforts of any Shark related programming or initiatives. In...
Read more

On the gestation period of the blackfin reef shark, Carcharhinus melanopterus in waters off Moorea, French Polynesia

Image
Originally published in the Journal "Marine Biology" at: http://link.springer.de   Abstract Underwater visual and photographic observations, over a four year period, monitored the presence of mating wounds on female Carcharhinus melanopterus . Mating begins in November and continues until the end of March as each female follows her own temporal cycle. Correspondingly, parturition begins in September and continues until January. Each female again mates 1.5 to 2.5 months after parturition, thus completing an annual reproductive cycle. The gestation period is 286 to 305 days, with slight individual differences. All resident sharks under observation followed this pattern. Evidence of reproductive events presented by transient females conformed with the pattern of the residents. Introduction The few studies postulating a gestation period for the reef blackfin shark Carcharhinus melanopterus have varied greatly in their conclusions. Based on an examin...
Read more

SHARKS DON'T BITE like we do

Image
Though sharks have gained a mythical reputation for being biters, their behaviour in nature is the opposite of what we would expect from the vicious animals depicted in the media. I had many opportunities to observe sharks under circumstances in which I expected them to bite, as a dog, cat, horse, or bird would tend to do. Yet they did not.  All other species, wild and tame, with whom I had the intimacy I shared with sharks, had bitten me sooner or later, either by accident or in a fit of pique; even my pet dog sometimes grabs my hand in her teeth along with the offered cookie.  Further, while the blackfin reef sharks I knew enjoyed roaming with favourite companions, I never saw them fighting with each other. They had friends but no enemies ! For years people had told me, and I half believed myself, that one evening I would be bitten and would bleed to death, or faint and drown. Since I was alone far from shore as night was falling, I could expect no one to...
Read more