Shark 'Feeding' Dives
photo by Mary O'Malley
Shark feeding dives
provide an excellent way to meet a lot of sharks, and represent a
unique situation in which sharks are treated well by humanity.
Sharks would not come to shark dives without the promise of
something good in it for them. So shark dive clubs usually bring some fishy scraps—in most
cases the remains left over after big fish have been cut up for sale.
The scent attracts the sharks into view, and provides a bit of
excitement as the animals investigate and try to get a piece.
But little actual food or nourishment is given. The sharks circle
far and wide through the vast volume of the visible ocean, in a
memorable and dramatic display, as they look over the scene, zoom in
for a closer look, try for a scrap, and socialize.
The divers generally remain in an agreed-upon position so that the
sharks can come and go from the food unobstructed. The procedure
works well, and is followed by divers around the world, almost
without incident.
Unfortunately, this practice has been singled out for criticism,
though no evidence to support arguments against it has been offered.
Scientific studies have shown that there are no ill effects on the
sharks and their subsequent behaviour. Further, no correlation
between shark dives and shark attacks has been found, in spite of
decades of shark attack studies and many researchers seeking to find
just such a connection.
Not only are the divers enchanted by the sharks, but the sharks show an unexpected level of interest in the divers, quite apart from their response to the food, and this is as true of tiger sharks as it is of reef sharks. They appear to enjoy the event, and the opportunity for socializing. The event is as special as it is because of this response by the sharks themselves, and that is an important point of which critics are completely unaware.
Not only are the divers enchanted by the sharks, but the sharks show an unexpected level of interest in the divers, quite apart from their response to the food, and this is as true of tiger sharks as it is of reef sharks. They appear to enjoy the event, and the opportunity for socializing. The event is as special as it is because of this response by the sharks themselves, and that is an important point of which critics are completely unaware.
So little food is brought for the sharks that no one animal gets
enough supplementary food to make much difference to its dietary
needs, and long-term studies of the travelling patterns of different
animals have shown no association with the presence or absence of
shark dives.
One can see for oneself, when watching the actions of one shark
at a time on a shark dive, that not all of the sharks present
actually approach to eat, and many seem to be there for social
reasons. Sharks don't appear to have the strong bite reflex observed
in mammals and related vertebrates—they neither fight, nor bite
each other. They don't bite the divers either.
The criticism seems to stem from the idea that sharks really are
the blood thirsty monsters presented by the media. Taking this idea a
step further results in an unquestioning belief that attracting such
creatures into the presence of divers, just has to be bad. The idea
is fully supported by shark fishermen, who themselves have no idea
how sharks behave, and for whom fighting such monsters demonstrates
their own superiority.
Yet they turn a blind eye to the shark fishing practices of using
not only food, but also special, bloody mixtures called “chum” to
attract sharks, often in the vicinity of beaches. Two examples are
the Lake Worth Pier and the Juno Beach Pier in Florida. Shark fishing
and baiting goes on 24/7, while life-guards on the nearby beaches
signal that everything is all right to beach goers. Bull sharks and
hammerheads are caught there. Yet, divers are prohibited from putting
even scent in the water, and shark divers are obliged to go to the
Bahamas.
One reason this double standard is accepted is because sharks are
assumed to be as dangerous as they are depicted in the media. Such
examples can be found quite widely. In French Polynesia, for example,
divers began lobbying for shark protection when shark finning began.
The fishermen counter attacked by claiming that the divers were
responsible for the sharks being there in the first place, and that
because of shark dives, soon the sharks would be coming out on the
beaches to get them—they were doing everyone a service by
finning them. Fictitious though it was, the argument nearly resulted
in shark dives being banned in the country, even though divers were
responsible for bringing in a high fraction of the tourist dollar,
and shark feeding had been practised there for decades without
incident.
Sharks are able to distinguish one event from another, and easily
differentiate shark dives from spear fishermen. Such fishermen are
themselves responsible for attracting sharks to their activities, as
they always have. The scents and sounds they cause are different from
those of a shark dive setting.
Most shark enthusiasts are divers, since diving is the only way to
see sharks in their own realm, so shark dives form an important basis
for shark conservation. Given that a quarter of shark species are
threatened with extinction, the benefits of shark dives take on
greater significance. Divers seeing sharks for the first time
typically use such words as "terrific," "so
beautiful," "amazing animals," and speak of being
enraptured by the sight.
The sense of awe expressed is so powerful as to often change the
person's attitude forever. They never forget. Many return again
time after time to see sharks in their natural habitat, and become
informed supporters of shark conservation.
(c) Ila France Porcher
Comments